Re: Hawai'i Superferry - Chapter 4
I disagree, the 40 million dollars in Hawaii taxpayer funds is being used to build harbor infrastructure for HSF's exclusive use. The pier facility you
mention was originally built for the cruise ship service, not exclusively for one company. That being said, if HSF built the harbor infrastructure without
Hawaii taxpayer money, this all would be moot.
In short there is no legal reason why NCL/YB/Matson should be required to do a EIS. But there is strong legal reasons why a EIS/EA should've been
done for HSF.
The Star Bulletin has a op-ed which supports my argument.
Originally posted by joshuatree
View Post
mention was originally built for the cruise ship service, not exclusively for one company. That being said, if HSF built the harbor infrastructure without
Hawaii taxpayer money, this all would be moot.
In short there is no legal reason why NCL/YB/Matson should be required to do a EIS. But there is strong legal reasons why a EIS/EA should've been
done for HSF.
The Star Bulletin has a op-ed which supports my argument.
Comment