Re: no conscience, no forgiveness , Re: The "Real" Middle Eastern War...
How hypocritical of Bush or any U.S. leader to condemn other countries with "...their government is not transparent."! But the U.S. government is? Over sixty years since the U.S. WMD bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the U.S. Government still prohibits release of information regarding those bombings.' A story that the U.S. government hoped would never see the light of day finally has been published, 60 years after it was spiked by military censors. The discovery of reporter George Weller's firsthand account of conditions in post-nuclear Nagasaki sheds light on one of the great journalistic betrayals of the last century: the cover-up of the effects of the atomic bombing on Japan.
On Aug. 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima; three days later, Nagasaki was hit. Gen. Douglas MacArthur promptly declared southern Japan off-limits, barring the news media. More than 200,000 people died in the atomic bombings of the cities, but no Western journalist witnessed the aftermath and told the story. Instead, the world's media obediently crowded onto the battleship USS Missouri off the coast of Japan to cover the Japanese surrender.
A month after the bombings, two reporters defied General MacArthur and struck out on their own. Mr. Weller, of the Chicago Daily News, took row boats and trains to reach devastated Nagasaki. Independent journalist Wilfred Burchett rode a train for 30 hours and walked into the charred remains of Hiroshima. Both men encountered nightmare worlds. ... ...
...Mr. Laurence (N.Y.Times employee on U.S.War Dept. payroll) won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on the atomic bomb, and his faithful parroting of the government line was crucial in launching a half-century of silence about the deadly lingering effects of the bomb. It is time for the Pulitzer board to strip Hiroshima's apologist and his newspaper of this undeserved prize.
Sixty years late, Mr. Weller's censored account stands as a searing indictment not only of the inhumanity of the atomic bomb but also of the danger of journalists embedding with the government to deceive the world. ' by Amy Goodman and David Goodman , printed in Baltimore Sun
--
A government's transparency should be determined not by the volume of information it makes public but by the amount and quality of the information it releases relative to the amount of such information it secrets. It would be surprising if the U.S. did not still have information from the Civil War, or even Revolutionary War, period that it secrets for fear of revealed facts tarnishing the faux image of the Union.
There is one certainty when it comes to U.S. executive branch pronouncements regarding their prior knowledge of Israel's aerial assaults and invasion plans for Gaza and Lebanon: the U.S. public will not find out the truth through either their government or Israel's government. Another question: Are enough U.S. Military and NSA satellite and ground intelligence assets effectively at the disposal of Zionazi War Machine targetting and battle planners that this war should be called an USraeli war along the same reasoning as USWar:Iraq is an USraeli war?
How hypocritical of Bush or any U.S. leader to condemn other countries with "...their government is not transparent."! But the U.S. government is? Over sixty years since the U.S. WMD bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and the U.S. Government still prohibits release of information regarding those bombings.' A story that the U.S. government hoped would never see the light of day finally has been published, 60 years after it was spiked by military censors. The discovery of reporter George Weller's firsthand account of conditions in post-nuclear Nagasaki sheds light on one of the great journalistic betrayals of the last century: the cover-up of the effects of the atomic bombing on Japan.
On Aug. 6, 1945, the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima; three days later, Nagasaki was hit. Gen. Douglas MacArthur promptly declared southern Japan off-limits, barring the news media. More than 200,000 people died in the atomic bombings of the cities, but no Western journalist witnessed the aftermath and told the story. Instead, the world's media obediently crowded onto the battleship USS Missouri off the coast of Japan to cover the Japanese surrender.
A month after the bombings, two reporters defied General MacArthur and struck out on their own. Mr. Weller, of the Chicago Daily News, took row boats and trains to reach devastated Nagasaki. Independent journalist Wilfred Burchett rode a train for 30 hours and walked into the charred remains of Hiroshima. Both men encountered nightmare worlds. ... ...
...Mr. Laurence (N.Y.Times employee on U.S.War Dept. payroll) won a Pulitzer Prize for his reporting on the atomic bomb, and his faithful parroting of the government line was crucial in launching a half-century of silence about the deadly lingering effects of the bomb. It is time for the Pulitzer board to strip Hiroshima's apologist and his newspaper of this undeserved prize.
Sixty years late, Mr. Weller's censored account stands as a searing indictment not only of the inhumanity of the atomic bomb but also of the danger of journalists embedding with the government to deceive the world. ' by Amy Goodman and David Goodman , printed in Baltimore Sun
--
A government's transparency should be determined not by the volume of information it makes public but by the amount and quality of the information it releases relative to the amount of such information it secrets. It would be surprising if the U.S. did not still have information from the Civil War, or even Revolutionary War, period that it secrets for fear of revealed facts tarnishing the faux image of the Union.
There is one certainty when it comes to U.S. executive branch pronouncements regarding their prior knowledge of Israel's aerial assaults and invasion plans for Gaza and Lebanon: the U.S. public will not find out the truth through either their government or Israel's government. Another question: Are enough U.S. Military and NSA satellite and ground intelligence assets effectively at the disposal of Zionazi War Machine targetting and battle planners that this war should be called an USraeli war along the same reasoning as USWar:Iraq is an USraeli war?
Comment